What is Distinctiveness?

The distinctiveness of the brand name refers to how easily customers identify a brand name with the associated products (goods) or services rather than someone else’s products or services. If the brand name incorporates word(s) that are needed by a competitor to describe their own similar products (common descriptive words), the words are not distinctive.


Distinctiveness is the opposite of descriptiveness for trademark purposes. The distinctiveness of trademarks varies along a continuum (often depending on use) from being highly distinctive (or inherently distinctive) to being merely descriptive or generic. Highly distinctive marks that are arbitrary, fanciful or suggestive (see definitions below) are registrable on the USPTO Trademark Principal Register.


Marks that are merely descriptive matter may potentially be considered to be registered on the Principal Register if they have acquired distinctiveness with secondary meaning. Generic marks (common or class names for goods or services) are not registrable as trademarks under either the Principal or Supplemental Register. More complete definitions of the distinctiveness of marks are found in USPTO Trademark Manual Of Examining Procedure, TMEP 1209.01:

 “Fanciful marks comprise terms that have been invented for the sole purpose of functioning as a trademark or service mark [words made up by the user]. Such marks comprise words that are either unknown in the language (e.g., PEPSI, KODAK, EXXON) or are completely out of common usage (e.g., FLIVVER).”

Arbitrary marks comprise words that are in common linguistic use but, when used to identify particular goods or services, do not suggest or describe a significant ingredient, quality or characteristic of the goods or services (e.g., APPLE for computers; OLD CROW for whiskey).”

“A mark is considered merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the specified goods or services.”

Generic terms are terms that the relevant purchasing public understands primarily as the common or class name for the goods or services.”

Suggestive marks are those that, when applied to the goods or services at issue, require imagination, thought or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods or services. Thus, a suggestive term differs from a descriptive term, which immediately tells something about the goods or services. . . .Suggestive marks, like fanciful and arbitrary marks, are registrable on the Principal Register without proof of secondary meaning. Therefore, a designation does not have to be devoid of all meaning in relation to the goods/services to be registrable.”


Composite marks, mark that are partly descriptive or generic and partly suggestive, arbitrary or fanciful, may be registrable on the Principal Register where the descriptive or generic part is disclaimed for exclusive use.


How Does a Brand Name Obtain Secondary Meaning as a Trademark?

Secondary meaning is when the consuming public has made a link between an alleged mark and the source of the mark. “A mark has acquired secondary meaning when it has been used so long and so exclusively by one producer with reference to its article that, in that trade and to that branch of the purchasing public, the word or phrase has come to mean that the article was the first producer's trademark.” G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc., 676 F.Supp. at 1467 (E.D. Wis., 1987).


The factors considered in determining whether a descriptive mark (not inherently distinctive) has achieved secondary meaning include:

(1) whether actual purchasers of the product bearing the claimed trademark associate the trademark with the producer as evidenced by survey or direct consumer testimony;

(2) the degree and manner of advertising under the claimed trademark;

(3) the length and manner of use of the claimed trademark; and

(4) whether use of the claimed trademark has been exclusive.

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc., 778 F.2d 1352, 1358 (9th Cir.1985).


The exclusiveness factor is a problem for many trademarks that are not distinctive because what makes them not distinctive is often that common descriptive words are being used to identify the product or service in the consumer’s mind. Since the words are common, they are not being exclusively used by just one business owner.


When does my Brand Name start earning legal rights? Depends on if the Brand Name is Distinctive.

THE DATE when a business obtains trade identity rights using a trademark (“mark”) depends on the distinctiveness of the mark. If a business wants to use a trademark to protect the quality and authenticity of a brand name, the brand name must follow the rules for achieving legal rights in that brand name. “A business will obtain rights in the mark upon first use only if the mark is inherently distinctive. If the mark is not inherently distinctive, a business may obtain ownership rights in the mark when the mark attains a secondary meaning.”  Coach House Restaurant, Inc. v. Coach and Six Restaurants, Inc., 934 F.2d at 1559 (C.A.11 (Ga.), 1991). Even if someone uses a term as a trademark, “if [the term] is not distinctive, the user does not have a trademark because he has no existing trademark rights.” Otto Roth & Company, Inc. v. Universal Foods Corporation, 640 F.2d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 1981). (See Examples of Strong & Weak Trademarks at StrongTrademark.com.)

Trade identity rights can be achieved using including trademarks (& service marks), trade names, domain names, corporate names, commercial names, etc. with varying levels of legal protection available under each category.  A business owner can obtain proprietary rights in a term “by ownership of a registration, prior use of a technical "trademark," prior use in advertising, prior use as a trade name, or [ ] other type of use [that] may have developed a trade identity.” Otto Roth & Company, Inc. v. Universal Foods Corporation, 640 F.2d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 1981). Trademarks are the most desirable trade identity right, especially federally registered trademarks on the Principal Register, because they have more rights given under the federal trademark statutes and common law rights than terms that do not qualify as trademarks. A federally registered trademark has rights throughout the U.S. even if the mark has only been used in much smaller geographic area. Without federal registration, trade identity rights are only earned in the geographic area where the trade actually takes place.

Being able to associate a brand name with ®  to designate a federally registered trademark is a strong business tool. Purchasing decisions are continually influenced by trademarks by making one product or service distinct from another. The International Trademark Association (INTA) in their Top Ten Reasons Why You Should Care About Trademarks calls a Trademark the Most Efficient Commercial Tool Ever Devised. The key to a strong trademark is its distinctiveness.


Tests for Distinctiveness

There are several tests to measure distinctiveness including: the Imagination Test (a test for suggestiveness) and the Need Test (as test for descriptiveness).

The imagination test asks how much imagination a consumer must use to associate a given mark with the goods or services it identifies. The product signified by an arbitrary mark [the most distinctive] requires great imagination. The more imagination required, the stronger the mark is. The "need test" approaches the problem from the opposite end. It asks to what extent a mark is actually needed by competitors to identify their goods or services. If the message conveyed by the mark about the goods or services is so direct and clear that competing sellers would be likely to need to use the term in describing or advertising their goods or services, then this indicates the mark is descriptive.... As the amount of imagination needed increases, the need of the mark to describe the product decreases. U.S. v. Six Thousand Ninety-Four (6,094) "Gecko", 949 F.Supp. at 771 (Hawaii, 1996).


A brand name that is not distinctive, such as a brand name that is merely descriptive or generic, is hard to protect from competitive use. The law does not allow brand name owners to take descriptive or generic dictionary words and claim them for exclusive use. A competitor is allowed ‘fair use’ of someone else’s brand name if the brand name is descriptive and the brand name is used in a non-trademark manner in good faith. 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(4).


At best, a merely descriptive brand name may only potentially be registered on either the USPTO Federal Principal Register after 5 years of acquired distinctiveness through a secondary meaning with the proper evidence or on the Supplemental Register. See Comparison  for the advantages of federal registration and the differences between the two registers.


Often the term ‘distinctiveness’ is used in trademark law as part of the term ‘acquired distinctiveness,’ another term for secondary meaning. An applicant of a ‘not distinctive’ proposed mark who seeks registration on the Principal Register must show acquired acquired distinctiveness by establishing, through evidence of promotion, long use, advertising expenditures, and breadth of distribution or sales figures, that the public has come to recognize the proposed mark as an indicator of source.


The Broadest Protection  Format for Trademarks

For the broadest protection, the standard character format should be used to register word(s), letter(s), number(s) or any combination thereof, without claim to any particular font style, size, or color, and absent any design element. Registration of a mark in the standard character format will provide broad rights, namely use in any manner of presentation. The stylized or design format, on the other hand, is appropriate if you wish to register a mark with a design element or word(s) or letter(s) having a particular stylized appearance that you wish to protect. The two types of mark formats cannot be mixed in one mark. A distinctive stylized format may also be registrable when the standard character format of the same word(s) cannot be registered on their own where the distinctiveness of the mark is obtained from the design rather than the word(s).





TOP 20 Global Brands in 2013

See www.interbrand.com/en/best-global-brands/2013/top-100-list-view.aspx

2013 Rank

2012 Rank

Brand Name

Region/Country

Sector

Brand Value ($m)

Change in Brand Value

1

2

Apple

United States

Technology

98,316

28%

2

4

Google

United States

Technology

93,291

34%

3

1

Coca-Cola

United States

Beverages

79,213

2%

4

3

IBM

United States

Business Services

78,808

4%

5

5

Microsoft

United States

Technology

59,546

3%

6

6

GE

United States

Diversified

46,947

7%

7

7

McDonald's

United States

Restaurants

41,992

5%

8

9

Samsung

South Korea

Technology

39,610

20%

9

8

Intel

United States

Technology

37,257

-5%

10

10

Toyota

Japan

Automotive

35,346

17%

11

11

Mercedes-Benz

Germany

Automotive

31,904

6%

12

12

BMW

Germany

Automotive

31,839

10%

13

14

Cisco

United States

Technology

29,053

7%

14

13

Disney

United States

Media

28,147

3%

15

15

HP

United States

Technology

25,843

-1%

16

16

Gillette

United States

FMCG

25,105

1%

17

17

Louis Vuitton

France

Luxury

24,893

6%

18

18

Oracle

United States

Technology

24,088

9%

19

20

Amazon

United States

Retail

23,620

27%

20

21

Honda

Japan

Automotive

18,490

7%

Not Just Patents® LLC

PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418  

1-651-500-7590    

IP@GoNJP.com


Aim Higher®

Facts Matter

Search Not Just Patents® sites:


StepsToABrand.com

Tie It Up

Securing the Right IP

Call 1-651-500-7590 or email IP@GoNJP.com or ContactTrademark.com for Responses to Office Actions; File or Defend an Opposition or Cancellation; Patent or Trademark Searches and Applications; Send or Respond to Cease and Desist Letters.

For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other sites:      

Steps to a Patent    How to Patent An Invention

Filing Requirements for Patent Applications

Trademark e Search    Strong Trademark     Enforcing Trade Names

Common Law Trademarks  Trademark Goodwill  Abandoned Trademarks

Should I Get A Trademark or Patent?

Patentability Evaluation

Trademark Disclaimers   Trademark Dilution     Oppose or Cancel?

Examples of Disclaimers  Business Name Cease and Desist

Sample Patent, Trademark & Copyright Inventory Forms

Verify a Trademark  Be First To File   How to Trademark Search

37 CFR § 1.53 Application number, filing date, and completion of application

Using Slogans (Taglines), Model Numbers as Trademarks

Which format? When Should I  Use Standard Characters?

Difference between Provisional and Nonprovisional Patent Application

Opposition Pleadings    UDRP Elements    Loss of Trademark Rights

How To Answer A Trademark Cease and Desist Letter

Shop Rights  What is a Small or Micro Entity?

Trademark Refusals    Does not Function as a Mark Refusals

Converting Provisional to Nonprovisional Patent Application (or claiming benefit of)

Acceptable Specimen       Supplemental Register  $199 Statement of Use

How To Show Acquired Distinctiveness Under 2(f)

Patent Pending see also Patent Marking

Trademark Attorney for Overcoming Office Actions

Functional Trademarks   How to Trademark     Surname Refusal

Patent Drawings

Grounds for Opposition & Cancellation     Cease and Desist Letter


Valid/Invalid Use of Trademarks     Trademark Searching

How to Respond to Office Actions

What is a Compact Patent Prosecution?


Examples and General Rules for Likelihood of Confusion

USPTO Search Method for Likelihood of Confusion

Examples of Refusals for Likelihood of Confusion  DuPont Factors

Patent search-New invention

Color as Trade Dress  3D Marks as Trade Dress

Patent Search-Non-Obvious

Ornamental Refusal  Standard TTAB Protective Order

How to Keep A Trade Secret

Descriptive Trademarks Trademark2e.com  Likelihood of Confusion 2d

State & Federal Trade Secret Laws

Merely Descriptive Trademarks   Merely Descriptive Refusals

Chart of Patent vs. Trade Secret

Register a Trademark-Step by Step   Trademark Fixer

ID of Goods and Services see also Headings (list) of International Trademark Classes

Likelihood of confusion-Circuit Court tests

Pseudo Marks    How to Reply to Cease and Desist Letter

Geographically Descriptive or Deceptive

Overcome Merely Descriptive Refusal   Overcome Likelihood Confusion

What Does ‘Use in Commerce’ Mean?    SCAM Letters

Section 2(d) Refusals   ApplyToTrademark.com

Trademark Incontestability  TTAB Manual (TBMP)

Typical Brand Name Refusals  What is a Family of Marks?

TTAB/TBMP Discovery Conferences & Stipulations

TBMP 113 Service of TTAB Documents  TBMP 309 Standing

Trademark Steps Trademark Registration Answers TESS  

Trademark Searching Using TESS  Trademark Search Tips

TSDR Trademark Status and Document Retrieval

What are Dead or Abandoned Trademarks? Can I Use An Abandoned Trademark?  Can I Abandon a Trademark During An Opposition?

Published for Opposition see also Opposition Steps/Cancellation Steps

Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses

Differences between TEAS and TEAS plus  

How do I Know If Someone Has Filed for An Extension of Time to Oppose?

Protecting Trademark Rights (Common Law)

Steps in a Trademark Opposition Process

Zombie Trademark  Not Just Patents Often Represents the Underdog  

What Does Published for Opposition Mean?

What is the Difference between Principal & Supplemental Register? What If Someone Files An Opposition Against My Trademark?

Acquired Distinctiveness  2(f) or 2(f) in part

How to Respond Office Actions  DIY Overcoming Descriptive Refusals

Extension of Time to Oppose

Trademark Clearance Search   DIY Trademark Strategies


©2008-2014 All Rights Reserved. Not Just Patents LLC, PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418.

Call: 1-651-500-7590 or email: IP@GoNJP.com. This site is for informational purposes only and is provided without warranties, express or implied, regarding the information's accuracy, timeliness, or completeness and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney/client relationship exists without a written contract between Not Just Patents LLC and its client. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Privacy Policy Contact Us See us at NotJustPatents.com